Posts Tagged ‘obstruction of justice’

We all know that Liberals hide behind “All presidents do that” when a Democrat breaks the law or otherwise violates his oath of office in very grave ways.

We also know that not all presidents commit perjury while testifying in Federal court (Clinton), for example, and that this excuse insults all who utter it.

Luckily there are those moments when a crime is so obvious that Liberals cannot so easily gloss over it.

The IRS filing in federal Judge Emmet Sullivan’s court reveals shocking new information. The IRS destroyed Lerner’s Blackberry AFTER it knew her computer had crashed and after a Congressional inquiry was well underway. As an IRS official declared under the penalty of perjury, the destroyed Blackberry would have contained the same emails (both sent and received) as Lois Lerner’s hard drive. <New York Observer, link>

This is clearly obstruction of justice, a criminal offense, and one that should be prosecuted.



Read Full Post »

Remember the Nixonian adage that “the coverup is worse than the crime”?

I just saw this news story:

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) claimed Friday that it cannot produce Lois Lerner’s emails to and from the White House and other administration departments due to a supposed computer crash. <The Daily Caller, link>

This Nixonian erasure of evidence, coming on the heels of the law-breaking prisoner exchange by Barack Obama (a unilateral and unconstitutional action that shocked even Diane Feinstein and other senior Democrat leaders), makes the impeachment and conviction of president Obama urgent and necessary to defend and uphold the rule of law and the Constitution of the United States.

Obama’s repeated and accelerated trampling of the Constitution via his refusal to enforce the laws of the land, abide by the laws of the land, and his evasion of Congressional oversight, can no longer be tolerated.

Our democratic republic is under assault by this president, and the Founding Fathers are calling all 535 members of Congress from the grave: depose this would-be king, before he destroys the last, best hope of Earth.

And no, I have no problem with a Biden presidency. None whatsoever, as long as our nation rises up to reclaim its heritage and removes a man from office whose actions show nothing but contempt for our heritage. Such an event might even thwart a Hillary Clinton candidacy — a two-for-one outcome that I pray to almighty god comes to pass.


Read Full Post »

I wonder how many 1,000+ foot tall skyscrapers China will build for every one we build in the USA…

1,076 feet tall, in China

I wonder why it took 13.5 months (that’s one year and 45 days) to build the Empire State Building but takes 10 years to fix a few miles of road…

Built in 13 months

I wonder why Ground Zero is still mostly a hole in the ground 10 long years later, and why the gash in the earth will be preserved instead of covered over…

I wonder if Al Qaeda will ever attack China, and if it does, I wonder if some Chinese will proclaim that China “deserved it”…

I wonder why Bill Clinton didn’t have the decency and good sense to resign the Presidency…

I wonder why Barack Obama doesn’t have the decency to end the charade and resign the Presidency…

I wonder how long Hillary will allow this clown to soil the Democratic party…


Read Full Post »

Maureen Dowd needs to go back to school again (as do so many Liberals) on the Clinton Impeachment. During the debt ceiling crisis she apparently wrote:

When Obama came before the cameras Friday to say that “any solution to avoid default must be bipartisan,” many Democrats wish he had just gone all unilateral and taken Bill Clinton’s advice to invoke the 14th Amendment. They yearned to see the president beat the political suicide bombers over the head with the Constitution. Impeaching a constitutional lawyer for saving the economy would be an even more difficult sell than impeaching a rogue for fibbing about a dalliance. <source>

Impeaching a rogue for fibbing about a dalliance? Such is the contorted Liberal mind — and in this case a female one, no less — that will excuse the felonious and grave actions of a man such as Clinton. Which is to say actions designed to hurt women, directly and through his assault on women’s hard won sexual harassment laws. She needs to read this 100 times and maybe then she will understand.


Read Full Post »