A few months ago, millions of self-employed Americans began getting cancelled by their insurance companies despite Barack Hussein Obama’s promise that “if you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance”.
Obama sought to minimize the fallout from his huge premeditated lie by saying that “only a few million people were having their policies cancelled”.
But we knew then that America’s private companies would also start to eliminate insurance plans and dump their employees into Obamacare exchanges, adding fuel to the fire of Obama’s moral crime by imperiling over 150 million hard-working Americans.
And so it is coming to pass…
Target Corp. (TGT) said it will end health insurance for part-time employees, joining Trader Joe’s Co., Home Depot Inc. and other retailers that have scaled back benefits in response to changes from Obamacare. <source>
Hey, Barack Obama: what happened to “if you like your plan you can keep your plan”?
Whose interests are you serving, mr. Obama?
Certainly not the middle class, or the underclass — these are part-time workers at Target who are getting screwed by you.
No doubt your knee-jerk response will be that such workers will find consolation on your bogus exchanges, where their personal data will be strewn about the world wide web, and where they will pay more for their health insurance than they did before, right?
But again, you are full of lies, and more lies, and more lies.
The exchanges are not cheaper, they are more expensive, as was shown recently in a comparison of WalMart’s health care policy to the Obamacare plans.
New Obamacare health insurance enrollees may feel a pang of envy when they eye the coverage plans offered by Walmart to its employees.
For many years, the giant discount retailer has been the target of unions and liberal activists who have harshly criticized the company’s health care plans, calling them “notorious for failing to provide health benefits” and “substandard.”
But a Washington Examiner comparison of the two health insurance programs found that Walmart’s plan is more affordable and provides significantly better access to high-quality medical care than Obamacare. <source>
And so the great destruction of American health care continues, just as Barack Obama wanted.
It has occurred to me that Mao Tse Tung apparently actually believed his collectivization of agriculture would feed his armies and his growing population, and that he never intended to starve an estimate 40 million people to death, whereas Barack Obama may actually have willed the destruction of American health care — that its destruction is not an unintended consequence of Liberal policy, but actually its design.
Can there be any worse indictment?