Feel the BERN!!!

I struggle sometimes to rank my levels of disgust when it comes to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Bill Clinton.

Each one of these people has been profoundly toxic to these United States, making a mockery of the rule of law and selling our power to foreigners on a regular Obama golf and mushroomsbasis (or otherwise enabling our most hated enemies), and it sickens me to see their faces or even hear their voices. I cannot watch any of their speeches, or even listen to them.

And so it is with great pleasure that I wake this morning to Bernie Sanders’ total domination of the New Hampshire primary at the expense of Hillary Clinton and her “inevitable” candidacy.


As many commentators have pointed out, Hillary Clinton led Sanders 40% to 4% about a year ago, and yet the truth about her chicanery while serving as Secretary of State and her being in-the-bag for Wall Street was embraced by New Hampshire voters in a big way.

Sanders won the primary 60% to 38%!

By the time all the votes had been counted, five hours later, Sanders had defeated his rival Hillary Clinton by an eye-popping 21 percentage points, the largest margin of victory in a contested Democratic primary in the Granite State since the start of the modern era. <yahoo.com, link>

And the New York Times noted that he won nearly EVERY demographic group versus Clinton:

He carried majorities of both men and women. He won among those with and without college degrees. He won among gun owners and non-gun owners. He beat Mrs. Clinton among previous primary voters and those participating for the first time. And he ran ahead among both moderates and liberals. <New York Times, link>

This result is crushing to the Clinton campaign, and yet we all know she won’t give up and will keep on lying, and obfuscating, and opening her mouth really really wide.

Hillary and the Joker

Note to Hillary: the open-mouth-really-wide thing is not working for you…

Meanwhile, the Liberal media is mostly still rooting for the Clinton campaign.

Note this opening paragraph announcing the Sanders win, from The Atlantic, a publication I once enjoyed but that has become a left-wing asylum in recent years:

CONCORD, New Hampshire—“Thank you, New Hampshire!” a somber but clearly gratified Bernie Sanders said to a crowd of thrilled supporters in a high-school gymnasium. The 74-year-old democratic socialist from Vermont had just resoundingly won the New Hampshire Democratic primary, dealing an astonishing blow to the Hillary Clinton juggernaut, casting the race into turmoil, and dramatically highlighting the dissatisfaction of the party base with its establishment. <theatlantic.com, link>

In the above paragraph, I note the conspicuous absence of the final vote tally, 60% to 38%, which is an outrageously anti-Sanders and pro-Hillary omission.

Here is the actual result — FEEL THE BERN, HILLARY CLINTON:

New Hampshire Primary - Democrat party vote tally


Furthermore, note the mention of Sanders’ age, as if trying to remind voters in other states that he is getting on in years.

Given Ms. Clinton’s decades-long assault on the rule of law, and her role in suppressing female victims of her husband’s multiple alleged sexual assaults and alleged rape in one case, and her actions during and after the terrorist siege in Benghazi that killed four Americans, and her outright selling of the office of Secretary of State in exchange for financial payments to her charitable foundation, and her willful avoidance of accountability during her tenure in the Obama administration through the use of a personal email server and the wiping-clean of that server when the FBI asked for it, we have to ask theatlantic.com and other Liberal media outlets who are rooting for Hillary Clinton:


Why do you support this person for president of the United States?



I’m sure we all have noticed the forced expression that Hillary Clinton imposes on audiences everywhere.

Hillary weird open-mouth strategy

How creepy is this?

It’s just awful and weird, and inauthentic.

But I am absolutely sure this is election science behind it, because we all know that people who are as dour and angry as Hillary Clinton reportedly is don’t look like this unless they are putting on an act, and such an act can only have one goal: make voters imagine that she is a positive force in America.

As if. We all know she is not.

I did a little internet research and found an article entitled “Body Language — the Magic of Smiles and Laughter”, and would you believe there is a name for Hillary Clinton’s weird clown face?

Yes, on the list of smile types is the Drop Jaw Smile, and this is what the article says about it (please note, I did not make this up, it is on the website exactly as follows):

The Drop Jaw Smile

This is a practiced smile where the lower jaw is simply dropped down to give the impression that the person is laughing or playful. This is a favorite of people such as the Joker in Batman, Bill Clinton, and Hugh Grant, all of whom use it to engender happy reactions in their audiences or to win more votes.

Well now, that PRETTY MUCH NAILS IT, doesn’t it.

So after reading this blurb about “Drop Jaw Smile” I went online and looked for an image of the upcoming Joker character in the next Batman movie, and this is what I was presented with:

The Joker

I have to say, this expression looks awfully familiar…

Hillary and the Joker

Ok then, so I think we’ve identified pretty well this particular aspect of Hillary Clinton’s nasty and fake persona.

As usual, I am disgusted by the Liberal media and how they play along with this visual strategy, running photos of her with what is supposed to be the opposite of her true countenance. There are many photos available that are far more true to life, and yet the media are rooting for her and so they give us more of this freakishness.

But none of this propaganda can erase the trail of destruction committed by Hillary Clinton over the last four decades, starting with failed savings and loans, continuing with four Americans dead in Benghazi, and ending with the selling of American influence in exchange for cash from foreigners while she “served” as Secretary of State.


Hillary as she is

I’m sad to say that I still keep up some mostly pointless arguments with some close friends about the toxicity of Barack Obama (or lack thereof in their opinions) and Hillary Clinton.

But I think I’ve broken through with a simple tool that makes it very hard for Obama defenders or Hillary Clinton supporters to hide behind weak arguments. The tool is a simple question:

Imagine you are an ISIS commander, whom do you prefer as the next president of the United States?

Even Liberals cannot answer with a Republican candidate’s name; it’s completely clear that Hillary Clinton represents the best hope for ISIS to continue imposing its caliphate on the world.

And therefore no one should vote for her.

And then the next uncomfortable question that Liberals must be confronted with:

Will ISIS thugs miss the Obama presidency?

Oh yes, you bet they will, and this makes the case against Obama and his would-be successor Hillary Clinton better than any other argument we can advance.

Go Bernie Go: the crazy Vermont senator with the New Yawk accent scored the same number of votes in Iowa last night, proving, if nothing else, that Hillary’s own party despises her and does not trust her.

I am heartened by the result because in this era of “King is wearing no clothing” UN-reality, a woman who trafficked in top secret government information on an insecure home computer that is believed to have been hacked by the Russians and Chinese should be disqualified to be president or even run for president.

The Obama administration announced Friday that 22 emails making up seven email chains that passed through Clinton’s private server had been classified “top secret” and would not be made public along with Clinton’s other emails. It was the first disclosure that top secret material had been on the unsecured server. <USA Today, link>

It’s not just her actions with the emails, it’s her wanton refusal to acknowledge what we all know, on both sides of the political aisle: her actions were reckless, and if she has no contrition, what crimes and errors in judgment might she commit — ON PURPOSE no less — while serving as president?

Barry and Hillary rules don't apply

She can’t be trusted to safeguard our nation and its laws, and Democratic voters know it just as much as Ms. Clinton’s ‘political enemies’.

Furthermore, Republicans seem to prefer indicting only Hillary in the court of public opinion for her devastating email scandal, but she worked at the State Department for Barack Hussein Obama, meaning that his administration is implicated in all of her security breaches.


The Iranian treatment of our U.S. navy sailors in recent days is a new low in the ongoing destruction, by Barack Obama, of our military credibility around the world.

The most powerful military in the world is being allowed by Obama to look like this:

US Navy Sailors on their knees in the age of Obama

John McCain, showing some fire that he never showed in 2008 when he should have easily defeated Barack Hussein Obama, raised in Indonesia and promoting anti-American views, had some very appropriate things to say about it.

From an article in Politico, transcribing McCain’s appearance on Bill O’Reilly’s program <link>, emphasis added by me:

This is desperation not to offend the Iranians because the Iranian deal has to be kept intact. It’s now made the United States of America be the subject of absolute humiliation.

Unbelievably, Biden said this was just standard nautical practice, Kerry said all indications show the sailors were taken care of, Earnest — that idiot — said the proper courtesy…Iran gave our sailors the proper courtesy you’d expect. And Kerry, to top it all off, expressed his gratitude.  If a ship comes into your waters, first thing you do is contact them on the radio, then you send the coast guard out and say hey, if you got a problem here and you know you’re in our international waters, then turn them away and we’ll help you out. You don’t have … American sailors with their hands clasped behind their heads, and of course they said there was no apology. The Iranians just put up on the Internet one of our sailors apologizing. This is one, a propaganda coup, and if this is international law that any boat that strays into another nation’s international waters then we’ll incarcerate them for the night and put guns to their heads, this is an outrage.

The article points out that White House press secretary Joshua

…Earnest said the sailors were “being sort of afforded the proper courtesy that you would expect.”

That’s where we are in 2016, folks: the Obama administration considers abject humiliation of American military forces to be “…the courtesy that you would expect”.

And let’s not forget that as this latest blow to American military influence is taking place, Iran is being given a path to the development of nuclear weapons and the missiles that will be able to deliver those weapons to distant shores.

Our enemies are growing ever stronger, and they are being enabled, directly and indirectly, by Barack Hussein Obama and the “idiots” (in McCain’s words) who support him and work for him.


I am truly fascinated by human society and its ebbs and flows of what we collectively pay attention to and which things a society says matter.

Perhaps the most amazing case study ever on this issue is the way in which the decades-old (and ignored) Bill Cosby rape allegations by several women suddenly mattered to people. Why didn’t they matter before, and what changed to make them matter now?

As is widely known, the comedian Hannibal Burress told a few jokes in late 2014 about Cosby drugging women and raping them, and almost by magic the seriousness of his alleged heinous acts entered our collective consciousness.

Chicago Magazine observed back in 2014:

When Philadelphia magazine last month [Oct 2014] posted a video of Chicago comic Hannibal Buress riffing on Bill Cosby’s myriad rape allegations, it didn’t take long for the Internet to explode. <Chicagomag.com, link>

hannibal burress

Mr. Burress had no idea that his standup performance would snowball into what is now the arrest of Bill Cosby and his potential criminal prosection.

But it happened.

And now Bill Clinton and his victims are getting the Cosby effect.

Alleged Rapists

When Bill Clinton ran for president in 1991 and 1992, many women came forward, as did various men who had been in then-Governor Clinton’s inner circle, with claims of sexual assault by Clinton (as victims or witnesses). The Clinton machine dealt with these allegations in a ruthless way, portraying the various women as “bimbos” and “trailer trash”.

But did it derail his campaign? No, he was elected president in 1992 and again in 1996.

In 1999, one such woman, Juanita Broaddrick, revealed her identity and gave specific, horrifying, detail of what she said was her violent rape by Bill Clinton (she had previously testified to the rape under a pseudonym to protect her identity). This is a partial transcript of Ms. Broaddrick’s interview with Lisa Myers, and I dare anyone to watch the interview (clip is below) and not wonder how Bill Clinton could have gotten away with the acts she describes.

Broaddrick: “Then he tries to kiss me again. And the second time he tries to kiss me he starts biting my lip (she cries). Just a minute… He starts to, um, bite on my top lip and I tried to pull away from him. (crying) And then he forces me down on the bed. And I just was very frightened, and I tried to get away from him and I told him ‘No,’ that I didn’t want this to happen (crying) but he wouldn’t listen to me.”

Myers: “Did you resist, did you tell him to stop?”

Broaddrick: “Yes, I told him ‘Please don’t.’ He was such a different person at that moment, he was just a vicious awful person.”

Myers: “You said there was a point at which you stopped resisting?”

Broaddrick: “Yeah.”

Myers: “Why?”

Broaddrick: “It was a real panicky, panicky situation. I was even to the point where I was getting very noisy, you know, yelling to ‘Please stop.’ And that’s when he pressed down on my right shoulder and he would bite my lip.”

Broaddrick also says the waist of her skirt and her pantyhose were torn.

Juanita Broaddrick: “When everything was over with, he got up and straightened himself, and I was crying at the moment and he walks to the door, and calmly puts on his sunglasses. And before he goes out the door he says ‘You better get some ice on that.’ And he turned and went out the door.”

Myers: “On your lip?”

Broaddrick: “Yeah.”

Kudos to Donald Trump for not being intimidated by the Clintons as they accuse him of being anti-women — he has served up his own Hannibal Burress moment of shining a light on old, but powerful, allegations against not only Bill Clinton, but also Hillary Clinton, who allegedly participated in the post-assault handling of his victims.

Here is Broaddrick’s tweet from last week:

Broaddrick tweet

After this tweet, news organizations began calling her and asking for more information.

She is obliging these requests, and they are seeing the light of day:

Broaddrick said that she doesn’t describe herself as Republican or Democrat, but is supporting Donald Trump for president. 

“He says the things I like to hear,” Broaddrick said.

She lauded Trump for broaching the issue of Bill Clinton’s past marital infidelities and allegations of sexual assault.

“I’m glad someone did. Everyone has been hanging back and most of the mainstream media won’t approach it but it’s something that should be talked about.” <Thehill.com, link>

Bill Cosby.

Bill Clinton.

Justice has a way of sneaking up on the perpetrators, even years later..

I don’t know who should be more insulted by the Democrat party charade known as the 2016 nomination process: all Americans, or fellow Democrats who are being told that they have a choice of candidates.

Bernie Sanders, who not that long ago was leading the Iowa and New Hampshire polls over Hillary Clinton, has become nothing more than a shill for Hillary Clinton and the continuation of her purely selfish career.

First he gave Ms. Clinton a pass on her devastating email scandal, in which she has committed more potential crimes than General David Petraeus did and yet Petraeus was prosecuted and made to pay for sharing classified material with his own biographer.

In January 2015, officials reported the FBI and Justice Department prosecutors had recommended bringing felony charges against Petraeus for allegedly providing classified information to his biographer, Paula Broadwell… <Wikipedia>

That’s right, Petraeus shared classified information with his biographer and was prosecuted with a penalty that included possible jail time. In the eventual plea deal reached with Petraeus,

Prosecutors agreed to not send Petraeus to jail because the classified information was never released to the public or published in the biography of him that Broadwell wrote. <CNN.com, link>

Now let’s contrast this with Hillary Clinton’s security breaches:

An intelligence community review has re-affirmed that two classified emails were indeed “top secret” when they hit Hillary Clinton’s unsecured personal server despite a challenge to that designation by the State Department, according to two sources familiar with the review. The subject matter of the messages is widely reported to be the movement of North Korean missiles and a drone strike. <Foxnews.com, link>

At this point we all know that Ms. Clinton’s willful violation of protocols concerning the handling of classified documents is of far greater threat to our nation than the far-lesser breaches that have led to successful prosecutions. And yet here is what Bernie said in the first Democrat “debate”:

For him to let her off the hook in this manner, on something as deadly serious as her “rules and laws don’t apply to me” reckless conduct, established clearly that Bernie is in the bag for Clinton.

And now there is this latest Bernie sell-out of the Democrat party: he just gave the weekend morning shows some sound bites about his belief that Bill Clinton’s sex life should not be brought up by Donald Trump because it is not relevant to the presidential race (link). Put aside whether you believe Bill Clinton’s tyrannical abuse of women is worthy of being discussed: if you are Bernie Sanders, and you want to win the nomination, why are your rushing in to save Hillary Clinton from this toxic subject?

Hey, Bernie, what did Hillary Clinton or people close to her say to you to get you to surrender the nomination like this?

Was it the same thing she told Joe Biden to get him to not run at all? You know, the Vice President of the United States for seven years now, a man whose career ambition is to become president, and whose wife thinks he should run, and who does not have failed savings and loans and Benghazi in his background, but who is NOT RUNNING?

Finally, if you are a registered Democrat, how can you stand this charade, this hijacking of your party by the Clinton machine?




Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 128 other followers